I’m getting mail at work again, which is nice. I went so long without it at AOL — somehow I’d given it to the State Bar incorrectly, and in the last 6 months I was there, I was never able to get it sorted out.

Today, I got the one-page info sheets about the three men who are running for State Bar President.

I don’t know any of them personally, but I like to vote, and I feel like a bad citizen and a bad lawyer if I don’t. The big issue I’m concerned about in WI right now is the proposed amendment to the state constitution, which would define marriage as between a man and a woman.

That’s already the state of the law in Wisconsin, although it isn’t statutory. This would make it far more "set in stone." And a lot of members of the State Bar are engaged in the issue — the Individual Rights and Public Interest Law sections want to lobby against it.  The Board of Governors needs to decide if the Bar will take a position.

I wrote each of the candidates to ask their opinions, both about the issue for the Bar, and the larger issue of the Amendment. We’ll see what they say.

I’m disappointed to report that Scottrade will not be getting our business.

I went in to my local branch late  this afternoon, power of attorney for Jill in hand, to open up a traditional IRA for her so she can get her taxes done. (She gets a traditional IRA this year, not a Roth, because her income last year was makes it worthwhile for tax purposes.)

According to the Branch Manager, Scottrade will only accept power of attorney documents if the person is incapacitated. Now, our power of attorney documents are more broad than that; they had to be, since we used them to close on the sale of the condo and the purchase of the house. They entitle us to engage in any kind of financial transaction, including borrowing money, not just saving it. They also cost us a pretty penny (as part of a set of important estate planning documents) and I really hate it when people ignore them or threaten to ignore them.

The Scottrade branch manager asked lots of questions, so we established that I wanted to open the account in her name and fund it from a joint account, but that I didn’t care if they wouldn’t give me trading privileges on the account. (Actually, that isn’t true, but I was willing to put off that discussion.)

And it turns out that they don’t have access to ValueLine stock research. That’s not a deal-breaker, but it had me less sad to walk away. I should be able to get that from the library anyway.

Bottom line: Either Scottrade’s policy is a bad one, or the branch manager is not too bright. I’m not excited to give my business to them either way.

Next stop, looking at Fidelity. The fees are a little higher, but I really like their financial planning tools. Either that, or the very low-fee BuyAndHold, but they haven’t blown me away.

I  found this clicking around various links from Dave or Liz’s blogs and decided to test my English grammar. I blew it on the ever challenging it’s/its, stationary/stationery, and then in the expert section, missed a few "both a and b" answers and incorrectly thought that a river might flow into the ocean through both a channel and a canal. Nope, canals don’t work that way, or at least thus spoke the grammarian.

 

Advanced
You scored 92% Beginner, 100% Intermediate, 93% Advanced,  and 70% Expert!
You have an extremely good understanding of beginner, intermediate, and
advanced level commonly confused English words, getting at least 75% of
each of these three levels’ questions correct. This is an exceptional score. Remember, these are commonly confused English words, which means most people don’t use them properly. You got an extremely respectable score.

Thank you so much for taking my test. I hope you enjoyed it!

For the complete Answer Key, visit my blog: http://shortredhead78.blogspot.com/.

 


My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
You scored higher than 32% on Beginner
You scored higher than 67% on Intermediate
You scored higher than 40% on Advanced
You scored higher than 41% on Expert
Link: The Commonly Confused Words Test written by shortredhead78 on Ok Cupid

Ordinarily, I like long books, historical fiction (especially pre-historic era) and young adult books.

And since I love love love Philip Pullman, I was drawn in by the cover quotation from him calling, The Kin by Peter Dickinson, "A magnificent work from one of the real masters." Frankly, I was very excited to buy this 628 page novel about 6 children living 200,000 years ago.

Unfortunately, The Kin is dreadful. I kept trying to convince myself I liked it, giving up on that about 200 pages in, and then just reading for the endurance factor.

On the inside back cover, the author says, about writing this book, "It shouldn’t have happened, really." He is so right.

What I disliked about this book:

  • Nearly all of the sentences are very short, 3-5 words.
  • Most of the characters say things like, "I, Ko, ask this,"  "I, Suth, say this," "I, Noli, thank," and "I, Tun, praise."  Occasionally they get to say more, or think more, but mostly they announce who they are and then say no more than 3 more words.
  • When they aren’t saying that, they say, "I am bad, bad," or "I am tired, tired," or "I am hungry, hungry." Reading this dialog is boring, boring, and painful, painful.
  • To be fair, part of the premise of the book is that many of the
    characters are pre-lingual humans. But Jean Auel was able to write
    interesting, intelligent books about pre-lingual humans.
  • Even worse than the main storyline, every chapter is separated by an invented creation myth. Although those include more complex sentences, and no one says they are "lucky, lucky" or "I, Mana, give" they don’t resonate and they aren’t compelling. By the end, I could barely stand reading them.

I did think the premise was cool, and I liked the way the little girls and women were portrayed as equally important as the little boys and the men.

But in the end, I’m sorry that Philip Pullman is so much worse as a critic than an author.

Charles De Lint is a wonderful author, and Onion Girl is a nice addition to his collection of tales about the city of Newford, an American anycity where magic and ancient spirits live in parallel to the rest of us, if only we could learn to see it.

Onion Girl tackles some ugly issues, child abuse and how the choices abused children make in response to abuse affect their lives. It’s an optimistic story, in the end, holding the idea that if people try to help, to heal, and to make good choices, they can have happy and productive lives. But it also examines vengeance and anger, and how those choices can spiral on and on, beyond our ability to imagine.

I like Young Adult books, as you’ve noticed if you read my book lists.

But when I’m upset, stressed out, feeling alone, etc, I dive into YA lit and read like my life depends on it.

When I was in Portland, I went to Powells 3 separate times, including the airport Sunday morning. I was there for less than 3 full days.

And I read 2 ok young adult books, Daniel Pinkwater’s The Education of Robert Nifkin, and Diane Duane’s So You Want to be a Wizard.

Socks not knocked off. Both books were clever and entertaining, but I don’t feel like I want to know more or think more about any of the characters. Maybe I’d read another of the books in Duane’s series, but probably only from the library.

On the up side, they were distracting, which was what I most needed this weekend.

I cried reading the Washington Post’s coverage of Wanda’s funeral today.

© 2010 LizaWasHere Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha