Wed 14 Jun 2006
Nursing Isn’t Just Cool!
Posted by Liza under Opinion
Yesterday’s New York Times (requires registration) had a very interesting article on the benefits of breastfeeding, and a government initiative to encourage mothers to nurse their babies until the babies are at least 6 months old.
The various studies on this make it look like breastfeeding babies are slimmer, healthier, smarter, happier, and generally more perfect than any other babies for the rest of their lives. But the article correctly points out that the mothers most likely to nurse are college-educated, over 30, and high-income. All of those attributes are separately likely to lead to healthier etc babies and future adults.
Graphics accompanying the article pointed out something that I was surprised to learn about race and breastfeeding. Hispanic [sic], Asian, and white mothers are significantly more likely to nurse than African-Americans. There’s got to be a health/prenatal care access issue there, and I was surprised that the article didn’t explore it.
Frustratingly, the US government is going about this initiative in, IMO, the most counterproductive possible way: Guilt and propaganda, with no substance to support real change. (Not that I’m anti-nursing. Having an initiative to promote it is a good thing. But what if we had a good initiative?)
A big media campaign that plays on new mom’s fears and willingness to do whatever it takes to be a good mom might work. But it is morally wrong.
Comparing not breastfeeding to being 9 months pregnant and choosing to ride a mechanical bull at a bar is both wrong and ridiculous. Formula isn’t poison! It doesn’t endanger children! And some moms can’t breastfeed their babies, for a whole host of reasons.
What would REALLY help new moms to nurse their babies for 6 months is substantive changes. US law says that those of us who work for medium or large organizations can take 12 weeks of unpaid maternity leave. Paid maternity leave for 6 months would make a much bigger difference!
And breast pumps, which you need if you want to keep breastfeeding after you return to work, are expensive! The most commonly used electric pumps retail for $250-$320; even manual ones — totally impractical for a full-time worker — cost $40-60. You can rent them from the hospital, but that kind isn’t portable. Government subsidized electric pumps would make a huge difference for low and moderate income moms.
Low-cost on-site daycare would help too! Noah’s school is way too far away for me to go over lunch, so he could nurse. My previous employer had on-site daycare, but it was expensive! We probably couldn’t have afforded it.
Yup, that’s a family friendly administration policy. Don’t actually help new moms, just make them feel guilty if they can’t find a way to breastfeed.





June 14th, 2006 at 7:36 pm
Great entry–I totally agree. Support varies so much across this country. In California, it was amazing; here in Virginia, very lackluster. I can’t imagine what it’s like in some areas. I volunteer in a food pantry and most of the clients aren’t aware of the benefits of breastfeeding. They end up paying for expensive formula which they can’t afford.
I agree about the guilt thing, too. I have a friend who had severe post partum and couldn’t nurse. She had such overwhelming guilt over it. Wouldn’t it be great if there were education to help women make the best decision for themselves and support for what they decide, instead of judgement? You know, those first few weeks can be so hard and at $60/hour, a lactation consultant is affordable for those who are in the demographic who do nurse: older, more educated, wealthier. You have good ideas–maybe you could start a breastfeeding lobby.:-)
June 14th, 2006 at 9:28 pm
Liza, I’ve thought about this. The WIC (sp?) program for food for pregnant moms and infants covers formuls, but I don’t know of any breastfeeding support groups and breast pump programs! What’s up with that?!?!? In the long run, encouraging pumping and nursing would cost the government less money!
June 14th, 2006 at 10:09 pm
I just posted about this same thing.
My bone to pick is just as you say: if you fall in to a particular group of working women (employed for a year with a company of a certain size), then you are covered with FMLA. Which holds your position. At best and at minimum, you’d receive between 6 and 8 weeks of disability (that childbirth is considered a disability is a whole ‘nother ball of wax), depending on how you deliver. Too many women I know feel financially bound to return to work once the disability coverage comes to an end.
And, myself included, heavily pregnant women travel to and from work until the Last. Possible. Moment. prior to delivery–sometimes putting themselves in danger. I live in New York, and managing public transportation and winter and a GIGANTIC belly and BH contractions just to get to work…oy.
In European countries, women get up to a year of maternity leave–encouraging women to nurse and concentrate on family.
Bleargh.
June 15th, 2006 at 8:43 am
Delurking to say you’ve made some excellent points. Also not just in Europe, but here in Canada you can take up to a year mat leave.
June 15th, 2006 at 9:11 am
I read that article too. I’ve been nursing my twins (exclusively till 6 months, when they started solids) since they were born. We were fortunate, in a way, to be in the NICU for a month because I saw lac. consultants all the time. Otherwise I think it would have been really hard to learn how to do it well.
There are so many women who want to nurse but panic when the baby doesn’t latch at first or their milk doesn’t come in as soon as they think it should (or perhaps as soon as it should, period). Just having had a baby is so disorienting, and then women are expected to just be able to get the hang of breastfeeding right away, not a simple task for so many people I’ve known. So what I’m saying is that on top of the lack of education that “breast is best”, funding, and willingness needed from the government and general public to effectively support breastfeeding, there is also an illusion that breastfeeding should be easy, that it is “feminine” and “natural” and “beautiful”. When it is hard because it hurts like hell, causes bleeding and cracking, requires shields, and just plain sucks, even the most enthusiastic of new mothers can give up because they think something is freakishly wrong with them. The article did not say much about publicly acknowledging the fact that it often is not simple and easy, nor did it say that as a part of this campaign more lac. consultants would be available post-birth and follow-up home visits would be offered.
And that makes me mad. The end.
June 15th, 2006 at 9:48 am
More great points!
Another thing that would be incredibly helpful is if lactation consultants were available for free or for a modest co-pay type fee per consultation.
The LC office at the hospital where I delivered doesn’t charge for any of its services, and I had no idea how unusual that is.
They support their work by selling pumps, nursing bras (they have a certified fitter) and other BF supporting gear, and they charge a modest fee for their monthly BF class.
The class, BTW, was awesomely helpful! There was too much chemistry and “why you should BF” info — why would you be in the class if you weren’t planning to BF? But the technique info, learning that I couldn’t suffocate the baby with my breast, and the info on the size of newborn/young babies stomachs was useful and reassuring.
My pump was a very generous gift (Thanks, Erin!) from a done-having-babies Mom, but I bought the replacement parts, nursing bras, and those awesome soothing gel nipple pads from the LC office.
June 15th, 2006 at 9:56 am
P.S. In the interests of full disclosure, I feel like I should say that Noah is not exclusively breastfed. He eats ~90-95% breastmilk.
While I was home with him, he nursed exclusively (occasional pumped breastmilk bottles), but since I’ve been back to work, my pumping doesn’t quite keep up with his eating. On work days, he eats an average of 2-4 oz of formula.
June 15th, 2006 at 11:53 am
Ugh. I read that article too and had the same thought. Breastfeeding until 12 weeks is difficult enough - after that it’s almost impossible to do while working. Wouldn’t a six month maternity leave policy be fabulous!?!? Money for boobs not bombs!
June 15th, 2006 at 1:38 pm
Boobs Not Bombs!
I love it.
*goes giggling back to work*
June 15th, 2006 at 3:53 pm
really.. should I even get started on this on a day that I was screwed over on my maternity leave? 8 weeks paid is not enough. My son needs me at this age… and I need him. How does an administration say they are for family values when they dont value the family? I thought I was being treated unfairly as a working woman.. its even worse when you are a working mom!
So my son is going to be fat and stupid because I am physically unable to breastfeed? That sure is something that a hormonal new mom wants to hear when they find out they cannot breastfeed for one reason or another. Boy I sure am abusing my child and ruining his future by not breastfeeding. I should be ashamed of myself. Dont pay attention to the crack addicted mom in the corner… breastfeeding.
and child care.. oh my lord. Seriously. I cant afford it, I cant afford to not have it. You cant get in because all the spaces are filled and so you are on a “waiting list” .. “Sorry boss, I have to bring the baby to work because I’m on the waiting list for 15 day care options and I’m waiting to hear”
I’m pretty bitter today… dont mind me.