Mon 15 Oct 2007
Larry Craig: The Gift That Keeps on Giving
Posted by Liza under Current Affairs, Opinion
I just heard NPR say that Senator Larry Craig is appealing the judge’s decision that when he pled guilty, he understood what he was doing.
Of course, I wasn’t present to see the actual interaction between Senator Craig and the judge who accepted his plea, but my dad was a judge for most of when I was growing up. I have seen the process.
Judges don’t just sit there and sleepily ask, “Guilty? Good. Next!” and then pound a big rubber stamp “Guilty!” on the paperwork.
Generally what happens is that there is a conversation, back and forth, between the judge and the accused defendant. The judge explains what the person is accused of, makes sure they understand, outlines the potential consequences and their rights, then asks the person how they plea. If the answer is guilty, there are generally further questions to ensure that the person understands what they are doing.
I’m sure some judges are better and clearer at all this explaining business than others.
But I also think that the most obscure trial court judge responsible for handling misdemeanor accusations of disorderly conduct explains things in a way that can generally be understood by anyone with a college education.
Honestly! Senator Craig has been entrusted to understand incredibly complex legislation, the nuanced decisionmaking process of confirmation of Presidential appointees, and the funding of the entire federal government! But he didn’t understand that when he pled guilty that he was admitting his guilt and accepting the consequences?
Puh.Leez.
Apparently he’d rather be thought of as a moron with unbelievably bad judgment regarding the legal system than a man who picks up other men for sex in public bathrooms.
That’s a tough call. Sex in public bathrooms sounds extremely icky, even to those of us who think that 2 (or more, I suppose) consenting adults should be able to do more or less anything they want to do. Whether that’s have sex and never see each other again, or get married and live happily ever after, or somewhere in between.
Here’s what I don’t understand.
Republicans have awesome strategists. And in Congress, they’re known for having much more effective party discipline than the Democrats.
Why on earth have they not forced Larry Craig to resign? His seat is a safe Republican one, they’re not risking it moving into the D column. But they’re giving the the people in the middle of the road something icky to think about , about a high profile Republican, and every single milestone in the legal process is met with fresh headlines, reminding us that either Larry Craig is icky, or an idiot. Or both.
I also don’t know the underlying truth of the matter. I wasn’t, thank God, in that Minneapolis airport bathroom.
However, it strikes me as unlikely that Senator Craig didn’t do what he’s accused of doing: soliciting an undercover police officer for sex in a public bathroom at the airport.
Even young children know that you keep your feet and everything else to yourself in the bathroom stall. A woman might announce that the stall is out of paper and ask for assistance, then wiggle her fingers under the divider to indicate where to hand that paper. But I honestly can’t even imagine that much conversation between men in a public bathroom. Unless there was a hidden agenda.
Aside from the idiocy of pleading guilty and then claiming you didn’t do it and trying to get someone, anyone, in the legal system to let you off the hook, what really bugs me about this whole thing is that Senator Craig has a perfect record of voting against civil rights for gay and lesbian Americans.
Maybe I should have compassion for someone so deeply troubled and conflicted about his sexual feelings for other men that he had to publicly proclaim that people “like that” don’t deserve any legal protections for being “that way.” I do feel badly for people who seem crippled by internalized homophobia.
But I can’t sustain that sympathy for people who choose to stay hostile and closeted, especially when their decisions affect the lives of other people. The cure for internalized homophobia is to come out and have the experience that it isn’t as scary or awful as you thought it was going to be.
Granted, for Senator Craig, it probably is even worse than he thought it would be. But that is ONLY because he was having sex in public restrooms and got caught, then compounded the problem by denying it in a particularly stupid and public manner.
And when you think about it Congressman Barney Frank survived worse. A couple of years after he came out publicly, his boyfriend was accused of running a prostitution ring out of their apartment. Ultimately, Frank was able to clear his name, and his political career has continued to thrive almost 20 years later.
I think this is because Congressman Frank was both honest about who he was, and about what happened and what he knew or didn’t know. Also, unlike Senator Craig, Congressman Frank is a smart guy with pretty good political judgment.
(I’m not ready to write a long post about whether the decision to remove the trans language from ENDA to get it passed was right or wrong. Of course we need to protect our trans brothers and sisters from discrimination — and yet, I also understand the desire to get half a loaf rather than none.)




October 15th, 2007 at 8:02 am
the reason barney frank survived all of that and craig will probably not survive this is not because frank was honest — it is because frank is a democrat. there is no way craig would survive politically if he admitted that he is gay. zero chance.
obviously, what craig should have done to preserve his career was be honest from the start about the charge and immediately raise holy hell that someone was trying to frame an upstanding godly family man as gay just because he has a wide stance. if he had done that, he would have gotten a lot of sympathy from both sides of the aisle, because the republicans would rally against what would be portrayed as a “gay witch hunt” against republican politicians and the democrats would not want to be seen as being on a “gay witch hunt” — as happy as liberals are to see craig brought down, most liberals are extremely uncomfortable with the little sting operation that brought him down. the problem with the way he handled it is that it makes him look guilty as charged (i.e. gay) to have tried to cover it up.
October 15th, 2007 at 9:29 am
Jen, I disagree. There have been gay Republican Members of Congress for whom outing /coming out wasn’t a political death sentence. John Kyl of Arizona and Steve Gunderson of Wisconsin.
But I agree, with you about what would have worked for Craig. The problem is that now, nothing will work.
October 15th, 2007 at 2:56 pm
i don’t know the circumstances of those congressmen and their coming out, but here we are talking 1) utah, 2) cruising for gay sex in a public bathroom, and most importantly 3) utah.
October 15th, 2007 at 2:57 pm
oops i meant idaho. both are equally bad for gay congressmen caught cruising for gay sex in a public bathroom.
October 16th, 2007 at 7:24 am
Craig needs to go if only for the reason that he is wishy-washy. Unless you have Clintonian levels of Teflon that is often fatal. As it should be. If you don’t know where they stand how can you know if they will adequately represent you?
Even James Madison, in the first Congressional Election, was accused of pandering to the voters to get elected by running on a platform supporting Amendments to the Constitution (the eventual Bill of Rights) when he had opposed amendments during the Virginia Ratifying Convention.
He explained that he wanted the edifice built before changing the paint on the walls.
Craig just flaps in the wind.
October 16th, 2007 at 2:50 pm
Much wisdom back and forth here. I can’t add to it, but I did want to say that I love your title for this post, Liza.
October 16th, 2007 at 8:39 pm
Craig actually did his plea by mail. This may not seem significant to anyone else, but pleas by mail are REALLY important to my low-income clients who cannot afford to travel 3-4 hours to deal with minor legal issues which can prevent them from obtaining those little necessities of life like HOUSING. If Craig does something that undermines the plea by mail system I think my head will explode.
October 19th, 2007 at 3:31 pm
You think this is bad, try living IN Idaho right about now! ‘Nuff said!